Turbos (obviously) make more power. More power requires more fuel.
(Up-dated as I learn more)
I've run some tests with an automotive multimeter that has a duty cycle function
clipped to one of the injectors. At max boost of 10 psi the injectors hit 100% duty
cycle at just under 5000 rpm.
Getting the extra fuel
- Additional Injector(s)
- Rising Rate Fuel Pressure Regulator
- Larger Injectors
Manipulating the ECM
- Chip Change
- MAF Signal Conditioning
How Much Fuel?
Wide Open Throttle
There's a few ways to get the extra fuel. Some not so good and some good.
But that's not the end of the story. You then have to allow the ECM to deal with the
extra fuel you're dumping.
The ECM pulses the injectors on and off at a regular interval (the duty cycle).
If an injector is on for say 60% of the time, it's at a 60% duty cycle. The amount
of fuel flowed through the injector in this amount of time is dependent on two major
items. The size of the injector (the orifice the fuel flows through) and the fuel
pressure. A larger orifice or more fuel pressure will flow more fuel in the same
amount of time.
Regardless of how you get the extra fuel, see the following section Manipulating the ECM
These can be standard fuel injectors or an on-off solenoid like the cold start
injectors found on VWs. Controlling the injectors is another matter.
On-off injectors just need battery voltage to operate. You can use a pressure
switch to turn the injector on at a certain boost level. This is pretty simple and
easy to hook up, but it's less than optimal. It's a binary thing; on or off.
Power levels don't change from one instant to the next to require this much fuel.
As power comes up, the injector turns on and suddenly dumps enough fuel for say 30
h.p., but the engine can't suddenly use that much fuel so the mixture goes way rich until
the rpms, boost and power levels go up enough to need all of it. You end up wasting
a lot of gas.
A slightly better method would be to use say 3 smaller injectors, each with their own
pressure switch that turns them on progressively at different boost levels. This
buffers the full fuel shot over 3 events instead of one and give a little bit better fuel
distribution.
Traditional pulsed fuel injectors then are even better. They gradually add more
and more fuel as boost comes up so you don't get a rich spike at all. Just the extra
bit of fuel you need from one instant to the next. These do require an AIC
(Auxiliary Injector Controller) though to operate them. There are many plans out
there on the net that are pretty simple. You can also buy them from some places for
about the cost of a chip change, but you have full control over future mods as well.
Rising rate regulators operate on the principle that more fuel pressure will force more
fuel through the same injector.
For a non-boosted EFI engine, the stock regulator works to keep a constant fuel
pressure across the injector. On one end of the injector, you have manifold vacuum.
On the other is pressure from the fuel pump. When you open the throttle,
manifold vacuum drops which means fuel pressure has to rise to keep the same pressure
differential.
A regulator for a boosted EFI engine works the same way, except that it can continue to
raise the fuel pressure when positive pressure exists in the manifold. Every psi of
boost in the manifold raises the fuel pressure 1 psi as well to keep the fuel pressure
differential the same. At 0 psi in the manifold, fuel pressure may be 45 psi.
At 10 psi of boost, fuel pressure will be 55 psi. In both cases, the injector
will flow the same amount of fuel because there's always a pressure differential of 45 psi
across the injector.
A rising rate regulator increases the amount of fuel injected under boost by raising
the fuel pressure faster than manifold pressure. A 3:1 regulator will raise fuel
pressure 3 psi for every pound of boost. In the above example, 10 psi of boost would
result in 75 psi of fuel pressure giving a pressure across the injector of 65 psi. A
44% increase in pressure from a stock 1:1 regulator. Following the rules of flow vs.
pressure, this gives about a 20% increase in fuel flow through the same injectors at 10
psi of boost.
This has the advantage of being relatively easy to install and doesn't require wiring
in pressure switches or an AIC that extra injectors does while still giving a fairly
decent (not ideal, but decent) and smooth increase in fuel as boost pressure and power go
up.
A down side is the elevated fuel pressures seen. These can easily go to 100 psi
if you're not careful. Higher fuel pressure makes the injectors work harder and can
even keep them from opening at all depending on how high you go and how long you stay
there. Also, you'll need to make sure your fuel hoses are in good condition and
you'll want to replace the stock spring type hose clamps with stronger worm type clamps.
If you buy replacement hose, be absolutely sure it high pressure EFI rated hose.
Don't take the parts counter guy's word for it either. Check the hose
yourself. It'll be printed on the outside of it. Another thing is that the
volume a fuel pump can flow goes down as the pressure goes up so you might run out of pump
capacity at 75 psi where you would have enough at 55 psi with larger injectors.
70 - 80 psi of fuel pressure seems to be about the max to shoot for while keeping
things reliable, but I've heard of others going to 100 psi with no problems. The
type of injectors you have will also be a player in this. Pintle type injectors are
less likely to stick closed under high fuel pressure than disc type injectors are.
You can also replace your stock injectors with larger ones assuming you can find a set
that are physically compatible with yours. This means physical dimensions, wiring
connector and impedance of the injector. This is actually not a hard thing to do as
there are a large number of injectors available from several sources, but with the
exception of the occasional oddball, most use one of a few different body styles.
The biggest concern is matching the impedance of the injectors. They come in high
impedance (typically 12 - 16 ohms) saturated injectors and low impedance (around 2 ohm I
think) pulse-and-hold injectors. Don't mix them. Saturated are the most common
in stock engines. If you have 12 ohm injectors now, make sure you upgrade them with
some of the same impedance.
Regardless of how you actually get the extra fuel, you still need to make the ECM work
with it. If you switch to larger injectors or increase the fuel pressure, the
injectors will flow more fuel in the same amount of time. The ECM doesn't know this
however. It'll still open the injectors for the same amount of time as before and
you'll end up with an overly rich mixture. The same occurs with additional
injectors. There's more fuel flowing per unit time when the additional injectors
are on than the ECM knows about. The ECM needs to be re-calibrated (new chip and/or
EPROM) for the larger fuel flows, or it needs to be fooled into thinking there's less air
mass coming in than there actually is.
For a lot of applications, this is done by modifying the look-up tables the ECM uses
with a relatively expensive chip change. That's not an option for me and I wouldn't
use it if it were. Because it's basically a new look-up table, it's pretty much a
one shot change. Any fueling changes in the future would require another chip.
If you have a programmable ECM, then you're in luck as it may be possible to update
the table yourself (if you can find a commercial programmer) as you modify things.
The MAF sensor measure directly the mass of the air entering the engine. From
that, the ECM calculates (or looks up) the required amount of fuel needed for that mass.
This calculation takes into account several factors. The ones we're concerned
with here are the size of the stock injectors and the stock fuel pressure.
If the MAF was linear (i.e., the voltage signal from the sensor was linear in relation
to the amount of air flowing) you could use a simple resistor to drop the signal slightly.
This would cause the ECM to think there was less air mass coming in and would then
command a shorter fuel pulse. This would normally create a lean condition, but
because the injectors are now flowing more fuel, the shorter pulse makes the mixture
correct.
The MAF sensor output is not linear though. It's logarithmic. At low air
flow rates (idle and off-idle), the signal changes a lot. At higher flow rates (wide
open throttle) the signal changes less and less. The way to condition this
logarithmic signal is with a couple pots. Basically, the pots are wired such that
pot 1 is sets the baseline (coarse) adjustment, or adjustment at idle. Pot 2 then is
the gain (or fine) control that creates the logarithmic effect as air flows (and sensor
signal) go up
For details and a schematic, see this page of an article on AutoSpeed for details.
Read the whole article as well. It has a lot of info about swapping larger
injectors.
How much extra fuel to dump is another matter. Boost pressure alone is not an
entirely accurate way of computing how much more fuel you need. 5 psi at 2000 rpm
requires less fuel than 5 psi at 5000 rpm does.
If you switch to larger injectors and manipulate the MAF sensor output to compensate,
the amount of extra fuel is handled automatically by the ECM regardless of rpm or boost
pressure. If you have additional injectors and/or use a rising rate FPR, there's
more to the picture.
Additional injectors that use a boost sensitive pressure switch to activate them are
limited in that they dump all the extra fuel or none. In addition to being a very
unprecise and binary sort of fueling, it's also additionally in-accurate in that boost
pressure alone is not an accurate way of determining how much more fuel you need.
A better way if you're using pulsed injectors and an AIC, would be to use boost
pressure to set the baseline and then modify the amount to inject by looking at the rpm
signal.
Other ways could be to look at the current pulse width for one of the stock injectors
and/or the current signal level from the MAF.
One thing to keep in mind though, is that all of these methods require tuning.
You can't just plug in larger injectors, hook up the MAF signal modifier, twist the dials
and go. You need at the very least a good O2 sensor and an air-fuel ratio
meter. With these (and preferable a good multimeter and boost gauge) and some time
on a deserted stretch of road you can get it tuned in pretty close. Ideally, you'd
use a chassis dyno with a wide range O2 sensor monitoring the fuel ratio. These are
*much* more accurate and will make tuning a lot easier. Rent for use of these items
is a spendy proposition though and will likely require the time of a technician / tuner
that knows what they're doing.
WOT causes other things to happen as well. Most ECM controlled cars run in closed
loop mode for the most part. This is where the ECM monitors the O2 sensor and
compares the actual mixture to what it thinks the mixture should be. By doing this,
it can continually compensate and alter the injector pulse duration to inject a little
more or less fuel to keep the mixture just right. This helps economy and emissions
immensely.
When you stomp on it though, all that goes out the window. The ECM reverts to
open loop mode and dumps fuel solely by it's internal calculations. It also tries to
dump a somewhat rich mixture which gives best power and a margin of safety. A lean
mixture at WOT will overheat and start melting things like pistons. Very bad.
What can be worse is if your favorite method of adding extra fuel isn't calibrated
quite right and is off to the lean side. During cruise and light throttle that
doesn't trip the ECM into open loop mode, the O2 feedback registers this lean condition
and the ECM compensates for it with the stock injectors. Once you go to WOT though,
it no longer does this compensation since it's ignoring the O2 sensor and you're at WOT
going into a lean condition. Not good.
It's always *much* better to err on the rich side than the lean side. Power and
economy will suffer by going *too* rich, but it's better than a blown engine from going
lean.
Created by: Dan Houlton
This page was last updated on 14 Apr 2004
Home
|